AMNH Summer 2013 Badging System Report

In my recent post for DMLcentral, “My Beef With Badges,” I called on the emerging badging community to stop conflating our aspirations with our achievements, and to start sharing a more accurate picture of the challenges we all face. I also tried to make clear that I have been a part of the very problem I now aim to address. As I’ve been asked in recent weeks to present and engage our community around these ideas, I’ve often expressed my intent to “walk the talk” and share what we’ve been observing where I work, at the American Museum of Natural History, warts and all.

Well, I finally got approval.

All CD

But before we begin, a few caveats. These are just observations. This is not a research project. It is based on a small sample, so no one should read too deep into the results (including us). So, why share it? Why not wait until the research is performed? Quite simply, we can’t afford to wait. Yes, there is great research going on, such as the work being done by Dan Hickey and his team. But, during this early stage in the application of digital badges, we need to learn what we can from our current practices to help shape research questions and to give us something to chew on while we wait the solid results.

Since early 2013, the Museum has been revisiting and exploring the benefits of incorporating a digital badging system into select youth-serving after-school programs. In summer 2013, 131 badges were conferred (out of 155 reviewed requests) to 72 youth amongst a pool of 38 different badges across seven programs.

Throughout the prototype, we were particularly interested in learning more about the effect on the staff and on youths’ learning, and on the ability for badge earners to use them outside the Museum to demonstrate their new knowledge, skills and achievements.

We created a new website prototyping a new digital badging platform, BadgeOS, developed and recently launched as an open sourced tool by Learning Times, a company whose tools had been used by the Museum earlier in the year. Each of the seven programs had their own unique section of the site where youth could manage their profiles, submit evidence (text or images) to earn badges, “friend” one another and leave each other comments.

The final report offers further details on how the badges were designed and administered, and the key observations we took from the educator and youth surveys. (download report here)

All Lang

After you read it, we’d love to hear your reflections in the comment section below.

About Barry

The Associate Director For Digital Learning, Youth Initiatives at the American Museum of Natural History.
This entry was posted in Practice and tagged . Bookmark the permalink.

5 Responses to AMNH Summer 2013 Badging System Report

  1. Katie O says:

    It’s so great to see the results of this! The potential for future research is very exciting. I think saltz was just dehydrated and cranky from being in the halls all day:)

  2. Maria says:

    SI NMNH started using badges in their Q?rius area. It would be great to see how their results compare to this.

  3. Thanks so much for sharing this report. Really good food for thought as my institution begins planning this coming year around science badging. I appreciated the frankness of the findings and the inclusion of youth perspectives from all sides.

  4. Oh and can you say more about how the actual badges were conferred on the youth? Was this something done privately or publicly? Were they visible to other youth and how? Was it a part of the program day or separate? Were the badges physical or analog at all?

    I think the form, presentation and emotion behind the badge or achievement can be just as important as the actual badge. Perhaps that might be a factor in the differences in how youth perceive the badges as well between different programs?

  5. Barry says:

    Thanks Rik! So this was just a prototype, so we didn’t incorporate everything we want – that said:

    “Oh and can you say more about how the actual badges were conferred on the youth? Was this something done privately or publicly?”
    Privately. Not ideal. Instructors were encouraged to mention them every once in awhile.

    “Were they visible to other youth and how?”
    Only if they printed them out and glued them to their forehead. Which I think never happened.

    “Was it a part of the program day or separate?”
    Program day. We wanted them to log in from home – and SOME did – and we wanted it to be accessible from mobile, and to notify them when they were conferred. Didn’t happen.

    “Were the badges physical or analog at all?”
    See forehead above.

Comments are closed.